Our Sourcing Standards
At Nutritioncorebalance, we believe transparency builds trust. Every piece of content you read is grounded in evidence, verified through rigorous processes, and sourced from credible authorities. This page explains how we ensure the integrity and reliability of all our nutrition guidance.
Read Our Latest ArticlesThe information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Primary Information Sources
Peer-Reviewed Research
We prioritise findings published in respected scientific journals such as the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrients, and the British Journal of Nutrition. Our team reviews abstracts and full texts to ensure recommendations reflect current evidence and consensus among nutrition scientists.
Government & Health Authorities
We reference guidance from the UK Food Standards Agency, Public Health England, and comparable bodies across Europe. We also consult international standards from the World Health Organisation and European Commission to provide balanced, evidence-based nutritional information.
Industry & Academic Experts
Our editorial board includes practising nutrition specialists and academic researchers who stay current with emerging findings. These experts evaluate new research, flag methodological concerns, and help us interpret complex data in language accessible to all readers.
Professional Bodies
We draw upon position statements and guidelines from the British Dietetic Association, Nutrition Society, and specialist colleges. These organisations synthesise research and develop practical standards that inform our articles and recommendations.
Database & Evidence Platforms
Our team uses PubMed, Cochrane Library, and systematic review databases to search for peer-reviewed evidence on specific nutrition topics. We assess study design, sample size, and consistency of findings to ensure we're citing robust, reproducible results.
Open Access & Community Resources
Where appropriate, we reference reputable open-access nutrition education platforms and credible community-led research initiatives. We ensure these sources meet the same standards of transparency and scientific rigour as traditional academic publications.
Our Verification Process
Research & Collection
Our writers and editors gather peer-reviewed studies, official reports, and expert guidelines relevant to the topic. We prioritise recent publications (within 5–10 years for most topics) while acknowledging foundational research. Each source is logged with its publication date and journal.
Editorial Review
Before publication, content passes internal editorial review. Our team checks for factual accuracy, consistency with current guidelines, and appropriate qualification of claims. We ensure language is clear and avoids overstated or unsupported assertions.
Expert Assessment
Substantive nutrition articles are reviewed by qualified experts (nutrition researchers, practitioners, or academic advisors) before final approval. They verify methodology interpretation, confirm alignment with established standards, and flag any gaps or areas needing additional evidence.
Transparent Attribution
All factual claims link to their source. Where a piece draws on multiple studies, we cite each one and explain how we've synthesised the evidence. If sources disagree, we acknowledge the debate and note where consensus is still developing.
Regular Updates
As new research emerges, we revisit and update older content. Articles are dated so you can see when they were last reviewed. If new evidence substantially changes a recommendation, we update the article and note the change clearly for our readers.
What We Disclose
Our Transparency Commitment
- Author Credentials: Where relevant, we identify the expertise and background of writers and reviewers so you understand who's providing the guidance.
- Source Limitations: We highlight when evidence is limited, when studies are small or in specific populations, or when more research is needed. We avoid presenting preliminary findings as established fact.
- Individual Variation: Nutrition is not one-size-fits-all. We note that individual responses and needs differ, and encourage readers to consider their own circumstances.
- No Sponsorship Bias: Our content is independent. We do not accept sponsored content or allow brand partnerships to influence editorial decisions. Any partnerships are clearly marked.
- Conflicts of Interest: Our team discloses relevant financial or personal interests that might influence their work. This transparency helps you assess potential bias.
- Scope of Guidance: We provide educational information on nutrition, not personalised assessment or clinical direction. Our content supports informed conversation with relevant professionals in your own care context.
Questions About Our Sources?
If you'd like more detail on a specific claim, want to suggest an emerging study, or have feedback on our sourcing approach, we'd welcome your input. Our editorial team reviews reader questions and uses them to improve future content.
Send Us Your Feedback